doc_strange: (BOFH)
[personal profile] doc_strange
So yesterday, our Colo provider's Chicago main router crashed, for no apparent reason.  I noticed because one of my off-site monitors paged me.  I called, they said it was unknown cause... and it came back online in about 10 minutes.  Yeah, no redundancy, but all in all a blip.

That's when the fun begins. Some hours later they "informed" us that we weren't reachable from their monitoring systems, and must be blocking ICMP from them.  Except, um, we're not.

Little history of events:
  1. Provider's router crashes
  2. Provider's monitoring notes we are not available, meanwhile I call them based on my own monitoring system.
  3. Provider's router comes back up about 10 minutes later
  4. 4 hours later, a Provider tech writes us to tell us their monitoring is being blocked and they will simply stop monitoring us if we don't open it up.
  5. I ask what ranges they monitor us from - since we did this before and opened up some ranges for them - and ask whether perhaps the alarm is related to the outage?
  6. 8 hours later, I receive back a form letter telling me they need those IP ranges open for ICMP.  Which I confirm they are. And I see Provider ICMP coming in just fine, too.  The form letter makes no comment on the outage,
  7. I call.  I get a tech. I have him check the ticket time.  Ticket was generated during the outage.  Niiiice.
  8. I explain briefly why this is particularly annoying.  This tech is savvy and gets it.  I start to wonder about how they vet their techs. Monitoring is restored. Joy.
SUMMARY:
a) Provider's router crashes
b) Because their router is down, Provider's monitoring notes we are unavailable...
c) Provider does not notify us
d) 4 hours later, Provider writes us a nastygram because, based on one alarm, they could not reach us.
e) When we ask if perhaps it's related to the outage, Provider again blames us with a form letter
f) Provider "restores monitoring" when a clued-in tech is confronted with the full information

Golly, I am sure glad we have our upstream provider monitoring us!  Not only did they not notify us of their outage (which made us unavailable), they blamed us for being unavailable and never re-checked if we were in fact back.  I wonder what they would do if we really did crash?  Mail us some dog poop?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-22 03:46 am (UTC)
ivy: (guesting)
From: [personal profile] ivy
Mail? Nah, they'd deliver it in a flaming paper bag.

Sorry that they suck, glad that the suck was minimized.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-10-11 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] girlvinyl.livejournal.com
Recommendation for a lawyer in Chicago who can handle DMCA and internet stuff? Remember the guy who sued google for $10 billion? Now he's after ED. Ugh.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-06 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biguglymandoll.livejournal.com
Heh. I'd love a note with Colo provider's name - I'm keeping a list of them as whom I'd rather not use again. ;-)

Last time I had an upstream provider crash on me, their tech finally confessed that they'd smoked a Juniper OC48 near Dulles airport and they couldn't see the East Coast. Had to feel a *little* sorry for them, the thing probably ran close to a million bucks...

Profile

doc_strange: (Default)doc_strange

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
67891011 12
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 12:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios