![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Today, I decided not to renew my WBEZ membership. I've been a member for... oh, 14 years, with a couple of gapped years when I moved, forgot, and they didn't find me before I realized I had to re-up. Otherwise, I've been a supporter the whole time. I love the idea of locally-produced material rather than network-junk stuff, and WBEZ has been great at producing good local content.
Today, however, I walked away in disgust. The locally-produced program "Eight Forty-Eight" aired a "story" that was nothing but a commercial press release in disguise. I would have expected this sort of pseudo-ad-placement from a TV news segment about a new drug or whatnot, but not from WBEZ's 848 on a "new ethical hacking school" - which sorts of classes have been around - and around Chicago - for years. This segment was nothing more than a plug for a company doing what's been going on for years. In essence, I was contributing to have an IT security firm get free advertising. Thanks. Here's the letter I wrote:
---------------
Dear Eight Forty-Eight,
Thank you for today encouraging me not to renew my WBEZ membership. I try
not to support the appropriation of nonprofit funds for private
advertising. Today, I heard a six-month-old press release rehashed and
aired as a "story" on Eight Forty-Eight. Ethical hacking courses have been
around since 2000, on a scale and quality comparable to that covered in your
May 3, 2007 story. Moreover, they have been taught in and around Chicago for at
least the last 4 years by a range of companies. It's nothing new. Yet,
you chose to dedicate what in essence was advertising time to a "grand
opening" story that actually dates back to December, 2006; see for example
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1213/p03s03-ussc.html - another press
release about this same company, turned into "news."
Very disappointed. I expect this sort of thing from broadcast network TV,
not WBEZ.
Sincerely,
[me]
Today, however, I walked away in disgust. The locally-produced program "Eight Forty-Eight" aired a "story" that was nothing but a commercial press release in disguise. I would have expected this sort of pseudo-ad-placement from a TV news segment about a new drug or whatnot, but not from WBEZ's 848 on a "new ethical hacking school" - which sorts of classes have been around - and around Chicago - for years. This segment was nothing more than a plug for a company doing what's been going on for years. In essence, I was contributing to have an IT security firm get free advertising. Thanks. Here's the letter I wrote:
---------------
Dear Eight Forty-Eight,
Thank you for today encouraging me not to renew my WBEZ membership. I try
not to support the appropriation of nonprofit funds for private
advertising. Today, I heard a six-month-old press release rehashed and
aired as a "story" on Eight Forty-Eight. Ethical hacking courses have been
around since 2000, on a scale and quality comparable to that covered in your
May 3, 2007 story. Moreover, they have been taught in and around Chicago for at
least the last 4 years by a range of companies. It's nothing new. Yet,
you chose to dedicate what in essence was advertising time to a "grand
opening" story that actually dates back to December, 2006; see for example
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1213/p03s03-ussc.html - another press
release about this same company, turned into "news."
Very disappointed. I expect this sort of thing from broadcast network TV,
not WBEZ.
Sincerely,
[me]
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-04 12:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-05 02:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-04 06:41 pm (UTC)I gave up on Tori Malatia (sp?) years ago. Opaque, autocratic, marketing consultant-driven programming is NOT the way to go. Everything he's done has been on the cheap and/or a profit-center -- except getting rid of most of the local talent the station had when he arrived, which seems just to have been preparatory house-cleaning.
Now, it seems I can't listen for more than two hours without hearing the same stuff over, so I do owe him a Thank You for making me more familiar with other stations again.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-05 02:36 am (UTC)I don't know if it was Tori's doing, but I am really not pleased with this year's "slash to save money, and pretend we're giving more" corporate double-speak, either. Come on, tell us you're broke, and tell us why.
Golly, I am surprised I am actually still steamed!