Um, I posted on 8-30 what was then the case, and what I thought of it then. To present me developments that took place SINCE then (9-5) and then to accuse me of "embroidering reality" is really, really insulting.
You want to discuss whether Gov Palin has shifted her open position and asked to close the investigation, sure. Sounds like she did. Sounds like she thinks it's now going to get bent politically since she's in the national spotlight, and sounds like she doesn't like what's likely to happen. Maybe she has something to hide; maybe her handlers have told her she doesn't need a circus so close to the election. It's strategic either way, just we don't know if it's got good or bad intent behind it. All in all, I figure there's some dirt (however much or little) in there that they don't want exposed and they're willing to take the lumps of being accused of stonewalling. That's telling and a negative in my book.
But do not you accuse me of embroidering a reality that had not even taken place when I wrote.
no subject
You want to discuss whether Gov Palin has shifted her open position and asked to close the investigation, sure. Sounds like she did. Sounds like she thinks it's now going to get bent politically since she's in the national spotlight, and sounds like she doesn't like what's likely to happen. Maybe she has something to hide; maybe her handlers have told her she doesn't need a circus so close to the election. It's strategic either way, just we don't know if it's got good or bad intent behind it. All in all, I figure there's some dirt (however much or little) in there that they don't want exposed and they're willing to take the lumps of being accused of stonewalling. That's telling and a negative in my book.
But do not you accuse me of embroidering a reality that had not even taken place when I wrote.