(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 09:48 pm (UTC)
Personally, I am finding out more about her, especially what her administration took on and did. The investigation, I think, is going nowhere with even the special prosecutor's office saying they're getting full cooperation and no major results so far; and even the Alaska Democratic party leadership has good things to say about her.

Re: creationism - I think the full article rather undermines the interpretation of that one line from one debate. She straightforwardly says she is for open dialog on religion: "I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."

I for one am very much against "creation science" as a curriculum item, but very much for discussion of the differences between science and religion. And no need to disparage either in that discussion. Then again, my schooling involved a state-wide top science program taught within a religious institution. It was impressed upon us that science is a matter of methodology, and religion a matter of faith, each to its own purposes. Mixing the two, it was explained, is best reserved for philosophy classrooms.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

doc_strange: (Default)doc_strange

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
67891011 12
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 11:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios