If the dogs just up and attacked him, ran off when he fired the warning shot, and then Kuenzli flipped out and came at Fish, then it's a little murkier.

Hmm. Interesting. So although there's a "flipped out" guy who comes at Fish, you think that's murkier. Can you go into a little detail on what you think makes the question of use of force murkier?

It sounds to me like you're taking the "equal force" argument - disarmed of his dogs, Kuenzli deserves to be met with equal and not superior force?